Proposal before the Washington Legislature could force homes into public view amid growing concern that closed listings distort competition and transparency

Olympia, Washington – Lawmakers in Washington state are weighing a proposal that would significantly change how homes can be marketed, as debate grows over whether private listings contribute to an uneven housing market. The measure, now under review in the state Legislature, would limit the ability of real estate brokers to advertise properties to select audiences without also making them available to the broader public.

Under the bill, brokers would be prohibited from marketing a home only to a closed network of agents or buyers unless the property is simultaneously listed for all brokers and potential buyers to see. Supporters argue the change would bring greater transparency to a market where many buyers already struggle with limited inventory and rising prices.

The proposal also includes additional provisions beyond listing practices. It would require new disclosures in certain short-sale transactions and establish updated rules governing dual agency, a situation in which one broker represents both the buyer and seller. A narrow exception would allow private marketing in cases where public exposure could pose a risk to the homeowner’s health or safety.

The bill received a public hearing in committee on Friday, where supporters framed it as a consumer protection measure. State Sen. Marko Liias, a Democrat, said private listings undermine fairness by keeping some homes out of reach for many buyers and renters. He argued that ensuring properties are broadly visible would give people a more complete picture of what is actually available when searching for housing.

Industry leaders have also expressed support. Ryan Beckett, president of the Washington Realtors, said discussions around exclusive listing networks highlighted concerns about limiting consumer access to information. In a statement, he said restricting visibility runs counter to basic principles of consumer protection in real estate.

Criticism of private listings has been building from multiple directions. Fair housing advocates have warned that off-market or exclusive listings may increase the risk of discrimination by narrowing who gets access to housing opportunities. Research has also raised questions about the benefits of such practices.

One study by Bright MLS found that privately listed homes tend to stay on the market longer and do not necessarily sell for higher prices. Another study suggested that open, competitive markets often work in sellers’ favor, particularly during periods of high demand, when broader exposure can drive stronger offers.

As lawmakers continue to review the proposal, the debate reflects broader tensions over transparency, fairness, and competition in Washington’s tight housing market.